Mississippi Finally Ratifies the 13th Amendment – Here Are Some Other Things that Mississippi Decided to Ratify First.

Leave a comment

After 148 years Mississippi has “officially” abolished slavery by ratifying the 13th amendment. We can assume that what took policymakers so long was the historical and present day desire to make sure white privilege was so ingrained that formal slavery was no longer needed. Mississippi policy makers, the moneyed elite and at the time the vast majority of its minority white population were all in agreement on how to proceed in this important task. The historic sequence of outright terror and new systems of servitude launched against the Black population included mass killings, lynchings, rape, sharecropping, prison labor and forced flight that decreased the majority Black population of Mississippi to a minority. This all sufficed in ratifying a political economy of white dominance well in place through the 1950 and 60s. Even after the civil rights and black power movements killed off the last of de jure segregation in Mississippi a new consensual de facto supremacist system still rules. This system embraced by far too many of Mississippi’s now majority white population, its policy makers, moneyed white leaders and now quietly endorsed by the Magnolia’s State new Black elite.

One example of the current ratified behavior is the prison system. Mass incarceration was created to ensure continued peonage for Mississippi plantation owners. It has continued today where Mississippi now has the second highest incarceration rate in the country, with over 75% of those imprisoned being black and still providing cheap labor. An added benefit of course is that after having to give up on poll taxes and grandfather clauses to suppress voting rights, the state is still successfully disenfranchising 14% of its Black population from voting through felony disenfranchisement laws . This is done without much of a stir from elected Black politicians who don’t want to look soft on crime and from Black elites who actual enjoy having access to free labor for their own events.

Poverty has also been ratified in Mississippi as a major national study ranked Mississippi lowest in overall human development and among the four states with the largest disparities between whites and blacks. The study found that black Mississippians, who make up close to 40% of the population, are worse off than blacks in most other states in the nation, ranking second to last on the health and income index (just ahead of Louisiana) and last in education. A black male born in Mississippi in 2010 can expect a shorter life span than the average American in 1960. The ranges of earnings for whites are nearly double that of blacks. Again no movement has emerged to shift resources to the Black community.

In the capital city of Jackson, a majority Black city, these race and class disparities are painfully evident. Blacks make up approximately 75% of the city’s population but are 90% of the its poor. On average, black families in Jackson earn 40% less in annual income than whites. The black unemployment rate is double the rate of whites, and the recent economic downturn has left many once thriving black families with very little disposable income.

The city itself has been led by Black mayors since 1997 and the state is 40% Black however the entrenched and ratified conservative policies of the state benefit developers, business elites and state workers who work in Jackson but live outside of it. The recently constituted black elite includes elected officials, ministers, non-profit and community “leaders” who offer no effective progressive to militant counter weight to organized conservative policies. Insider conversations seem to be the tactic of the day. The fight for worker rights, for criminal justice system reforms or for redirection of public spending on infrastructure is fought more through lobbying efforts than building a critical mass of people to challenge conservative orthodoxy. Mississippi law makers and the privileged elite in 1865 could not have hoped for a better result. Officially ratified or not the 13th Amendment has not shown itself to be more durable than the power of white supremacy.

Gaza Strip Was Gettin Bombed, Obama Didn’t Say Shit

Leave a comment

As Lupe Fiasco said in Words I Never Said “Gaza Strip Was Gettin Bombed, Obama Didn’t Say Shit…” Well, actually he has. The White House has fully endorsed Israel’s bombing campaign against the Gaza strip. Press Secretary Jay Carney, speaking for the Obama Administration, stated “there is no justification for rockets from Gaza.” I guess stealing land, destroying homes, drone bombing campaigns and creating an updated American style reservation that amounts to the largest prison in the world would not be justifiable for those not living in it.

The taking of land, homes and lives by the European settlement project called “Israel” is continually supported by the US and corporate western media. The continued hardships suffered by Palestinians are rarely reported on; the day-to-day misery is both downplayed and justified in the United States corporate media. The military occupation of Palestine that controls where Palestinians live, where they travel, their access to daily goods, water and other resources does not receive much coverage. If you only receive news from U.S. corporate media you would not hear about legalized apartheid laws; military check points, demolished homes or racist policies for the deportation of Africans.  Interior Minister Eli Yishai without concern over any western or US condemnation stated, “The infiltrators along with the Palestinians will quickly bring us to the end of the Zionist dream,”  that “Muslims that arrive here do not even believe that this country belongs to us, to the white man.”  Furthermore, the the most obvious fact that seems to escape the corporate media scrutiny is Israel’s possession of an arsenal of nuclear weapons. Corporate media trips over itself to turn a blind eye to this obvious fact as it reports on Iran’s “suspected” nuclear ambitions and lays the ground work for the ideological support needed for the next U.S. war in the middle east.

This is obviously not done by mistake. There is no lack of information flow to the white house or to corporate media. Sides were chosen long ago. The British led a European sponsored taking of historic Palestine via  diplomacy and colonialism at gun point was the start of this current battle. The relationship between the US, apartheid South Africa and Israel is well documented. What is relatively new is that now the face of the U.S. support for the oppression of other people is Black. The soon to be Secretary of State will probably be Black. The Congressional Black Caucus will no longer speak out against injustices. Black organizations with an internationalist perspective are inconsequential. As for the collective Black voice (yes sometimes we are monolithic check out the vote for Obama) we have at best collectively picked and or backed “leaders” to represent us based on symbolism without any real study into their political beliefs. We have instead allowed those so-called leaders to dictate an agenda to us. At worse, we have given up our historic role in the United States as the people who will speak truth to power. In the grasp for acceptance, for celebrity, for money, for positions within existing corporate and or government structures many of us have left our moral compass behind. We will not put any pressure on corporate and or government structures to stop supporting the Israeli bombardment of Gaza, because we will not put any pressure on any government or corporate structure to stop the “soft” bombing of our own communities. How many of us can finish that Lupe Fiasco lyric, “That’s why I didn’t vote him next one either” and be willing to sustain the wrath of negative responses from the guardians of the Presidents image but with little concern about his policies.

Protocol At Demonstrations - If An Arrest Takes Place

Leave a comment

Reblogged from Grassroots Thinking:

I have been getting questions lately from allies about what to do during and immediately after an arrest at a demonstration. These protocols, meant to serve as a quick guide, are best practices for responding to arrest of demonstrators. They should be applied based on the particular type of demonstration. Some demonstrations are not "permitted" and  involve civil disobedience or direct action will have a higher risk of arrest.

Read more… 978 more words

When The Movement Was Strong And Culture Was A Weapon – From Aretha to Beyonce

4 Comments

A 1970′s news article on Aretha Franklin’s (Aretha Franklin news article ) heroic gesture to pay bail for then recently arrested Angela Davis has been circulating on face-book. Aretha offered to pay bail stemming from the capture of Angela Davis in New York after a massive FBI woman hunt in 1970. Ms. Davis was charged with murder, kidnapping and conspiracy for allegedly supplying weapons for an attempted courtroom escape led by Jonathan Jackson to free his brother and revolutionary leader George Jackson.  Angela Davis already well-known for her battles with then California Governor Ronald Reagan over her right to teach in California Universities after being identified as a communist sealed her image as a revolutionary icon in the Black movement.  The article has caught the attention of many because of Aretha’s striking and unapologetic stance in offering bail towards Mr. Davis release. Aretha Franklin states:

“My Daddy (Detroit’s Rev. C.L. Franklin) says I don’t know what I ‘m doing. Well I respect him of course but I’m going to stick by my beliefs. Angela Davis must go free. Black people will be free. I’ve been locked up (for disturbing the peace in Detroit) and I know you got to disturb the peace when you can’t get no peace. Jail is hell to be in. I’m going to see her free if there is any justice in our courts, not because I believe in Communism, but because she is a Black woman and she wants freedom for black people. I have the money; I got it from black people – they’ve made me financially able to have it – and I want to use it in ways that will help our people”

For context Aretha is speaking during a time in the early 1970′s when the dominant ideological current in the Black community had shifted from civil rights to Black Power. With all the inconsistencies related to the Black Power slogan it is clear that a critical mass of Black people during that time internalized it as statement of Black pride, activism within the community, standing up and forcefully challenging white supremacy over black lives and the contemplation of different forms of struggle and ideological beliefs within while attempting unity to the public. Broad concepts because it lacked the crystallization of an actual program to gain “freedom” but nonetheless during that time the idea of “Black Power” set the tone for community actions and collective responsibility.

Aretha of 1970 states she has “disturbed the peace and has been arrested”. She is hinting to a political arrest not one for drugs, shoplifting or for domestic violence, but for advocating for her people. Aretha Franklin was as big as it gets in terms of mainstream artist during that time in the Black community. She was not touting her donations to charity but her personal involvement and desire to be a part of the movement to free black people and in particular her solidarity with another Black woman.

What makes these statements even more note worthy is that Aretha was more a product of the times than a devout revolutionary artist. She was moved to her position by what was happening around her. Just as today’s pop figures/ artist are also not devout revolutionaries and are moved these days by anything but a movement.  As time evolves you can see how in just one generation a figure like Muhammad Ali takes a stance against US military adventurism that costs him millions in personal wealth and prestige from the dominant power players to his daughter Laila’s promotion of US military adventurism in an upcoming television series that will probably earn her great sums.  Times and context will mostly dictate this outcome and activist types should not waste much time in a critique of the vast majority of popular artist for not being “political” but instead movement people should be critiqued for hoping that popular figures/artist in today’s context will themselves be committed to community action.

The repression brought upon movement building in the late 1960s and 70′s is well documented. In addition corporate and government forces have continually gained insight on suppressing radical political movements. The playbook on shifting consciousness and controlling bodies works as valves to suppress another rise in movement building activity. The over indulgence in celebrity culture; increased criminalization of drug users; increased arrest and further criminalization of Black men; the stripping of access of working class jobs and government jobs from black people; the rise of non-profit models of changes; the mainstreaming and assimilation of black protest culture into democratic politics and the rise of the professional black pundit and moderate black democrat as community leaders; the monetization of the black church; and the explosion of consumer narcissism, just to name a few have all had their desired effects on demobilizing activist work.

Even in areas of  recently allowable political activity we are now on the defensive as mainstream Black organizations are at work fighting to retain our voting rights. In addition many groups are so concerned about becoming the next “Acorn” (a group stripped of its funding and reputation) that they re-enforce the limited narrative on political struggle as one of voting for moderate corporate Black candidates. This leaves us in an ongoing battle without any strategy for forward action on resource development and community control. Any attempt to create a radical anti-capitalist nationalist type movement is suffocated by negative corporate media propaganda or complete lack of coverage. In addition we suffer from our own inability to work together, a lack of direction and insufficient models that encourage others to join.

Organizers sometimes themselves believe that the lack of movement building could be cured if popular figures/artist were more political . With some notable exceptions this will never be the case. Popular figures/artist are a great barometer of their times for certain aspects of culture, but not for creating political movements. Remember the 1980s were an upswing in political art mainly connected to hip-hop, but it did not turn into large scale mobilization. Debating the community involvement of figures like Beyonce or Jay-Z is just as useful to community building as debating who is the greatest rapper of all times (that would be Biggie by the way so why talk about it) or the best sports team. It’s fun but has nothing to do with movement building.

What Aretha’s statement in 1970 does say to us is that the possibilities of moving a critical mass is inclusive of popular figures/artist . Aretha’s comments show us that  popular figures/artist like the rest of us can take bold inspiring steps, usually within the context of larger bolder inspiring actions. The Black community and the activist within can’t hope for short cuts if we want mobilization. Dismissing today’s popular figures/artist is the easy part, building the movement that shapes and begins to create popular cultural figures/artist to move people to action as opposed to supporting inertia is where the struggle is.

Know Your Rights Info, What To Expect When Arrested in NY, and Observing the Police

Leave a comment

Reblogged from Grassroots Thinking:

Basic Know Your Rights Information

I. Four Levels of Police Encounters/Intrusions

1. Approach/Common Law Right to Inquire
2. Explanatory Information
3. Stop/Frisk
4. Arrest/Search
a. Arrest with a Warrant
b. Arrest without a Warrant
c. Search
d. Searching Your Home
e. Searching Your Vehicle

II. What To Expect After Arrest

• Precinct to Central Booking
• Miranda Warnings
• Your Stay in Central Booking…

Read more… 4,012 more words

With new activity opposing police violence wanted to resend this out

The Attack on New York Congressional Candidate Charles Barron by Liberals and the Corporate Right Wing Shows Why We Need Independent Black Leadership

Leave a comment

Reading the attack by Moveon.org (http://kenyonfarrow.com/2012/06/13/moveon-org-denounces-black-nyc-councilmember-why/)  on New York Councilman Charles Barron was a reminder of how little things change in America. The need to demonize Black leaders who are unrepentant in creating a sphere of Black organizing power and in holding independent political positions is as much in play today as it was during the Black Power era of the 1960′s. Since the destruction of that movement, there remains sustained vigilance amongst white political elites to guarantee that Black leader who step outside the acceptable parameters of political thought gets knocked down. Liberals believe that they represent the cutting edge of a rational left discourse. Through their delusional fog of self righteousness they believe they should gut check anyone who steps outside their artificial boundaries.

Leaving the showmanship of a Charles Barron aside, it is quite obvious that the attacks against him from liberals (and the right wing) is because of his independent thinking.  He won’t subvert his beliefs to fall in line with the dominant liberal narrative of what it means to be “progressive.” His clear views on US foreign policy being about controlling resources for the west and destabilizing any nation or land mass that does not heed to it makes him a “tea-partier” according to Move-On. Not supporting Israel, a state created by the west on the land of the indigenous population through genocidal practices including killings, mass expulsions and apartheid practices (hmm…does that sound familiar to anyone even remotely knowledgeable on US history)  makes him anti-Semitic in the eyes of liberals. To be a good “progressive” (the new buzz word for liberals today) apparently you have to be down for a little European land grab and you must accept as true all US State Department and corporate media’s pronouncements on this week’s enemy who is “trying to take away our freedoms.”

On gay marriage, Mr. Barron says he won’t block any legislation but does not agree with the idea because of his religion. He also says he won’t compare the struggle for marriage equality to the civil rights/human rights struggle of a formally enslaved population. Is this really the most backwards position on this issue? According to Move-On this position is a primary reason why Mr. Barron, a three time New York City Councilman, should not hold office. Lastly, he is opposed to the idea of charter schools becoming the new education paradigm because they are mostly profit driven entities with strong corporate backing that feed off public funds. The charter school industry has yet to produce any evidence of their vast superiority over public schools in test scores or academic achievement. In fact most studies rank them below public schools in academic achievement.  But these issues are at the heart of the Move-On attack and are why his opponent is receiving so much support from liberal and corporate pay masters (read Juan Gonzales story in the NY Daily News http://www.nydailynews.com/wall-st-big-shots-prominent-politicians-worried-charles-barron-bid-brooklyn-congressional-seat-article-1.1094559)

Liberals have similar anxieties as the right wing. However unlike the right wing who still like their Black people invisible, liberals want Black faces who push the issues that are most sacred to them said in the language that makes white people feel safe, snuggly and secure. To be good with the liberal crowd you must always end any critique of US policy in one of several ways. Always support the troops and the good intentions of US foreign policy no matter how many people of color die. Respect the “great promise” of American democracy no matter how long slavery and Jim Crow lasted, no matter the great poverty of Black communities, “hope” is only an election or legislative session away. The liberal has too much skin in the game to have someone, especially independent Black leadership attempt to dictate changes of any significance and weaken the air tight grip they now enjoy over the black populace.

To make matters worse the social justice left, inclusive of people of color groups is mostly silent on protecting a natural ally like Charles Barron. These groups want plenty of black faces and ideas but are also leery of independent Black leadership. There has been an uneasy relationship forged with liberals and the foundation world since the 2008 right-wing led economic collapse.  This has led to a shift right for some in the left world in the sometimes understandable chase for relevancy. This shift means that Black leaders and organizers can also feed off the trough as long as they get their priorities straight. Priority one is to learn that the term People of Color is the New “Black.” No more Black issues to speak of unless it’s in the context of a broader people of color framework. Otherwise you will be out in the cold when it comes to funding and access.

This last decade has now more than ever silenced independent radical black leadership. Charles Barron in his attempt to win a New York Congressional seat has further exposed the sentiments of our time. The right is opposed and will let you know it. Liberals and certain members of the corporate class want their controllable alternative and have the money to make it happen. While most in the formally radical now progressive left stay silent because to speak up jeopardizes alliances and the chance to be relevant.